Terrence Malick is a unique and somewhat frustrating figure in contemporary film. In the years since
Badlands, his 1973 debut, he's made only three movies:
Days of Heaven (1978),
The Thin Red Line (1998), and
The New World (2005). Highly regarded for his widescreen, naturalistic compositions, Malick maintains a private life unusual for one of the most lauded types of modern artist, the film director. His background as a young philosophy professor, news magazine journalist, and uncredited scriptwriter for Jack Nicholson and Clint Eastwood has had great impact on his modest output.
Badlands is violent, poetic, ironic and weirdly romantic, and as confident, revelatory and exciting a film debut as has ever been made.
An impossibly young-looking
Martin Sheen (and his amazing hair) and a willowy and winsome Sissy Spacek play Kit and Holly, two aimless, and indeed amoral, heartland American kids who kill a lot of innocent people. When Kit sees her twirling her baton in her front yard, it's a textbook example of what will come to be called "meet cute" but it will not end that way. The estimable Warren Oates plays Spacek's widower father and soon he will of course forbid Kit to see his daughter any longer. We all know this story, we know its moves and its parries, but we have never seen it quite like this before.
What's more romantic than teenagers on the run? The trouble they can get into is more desirable than the slow death they see at home. That's why Holly doesn't escape when she has the chance: "It was better to spend a week with one who loved me for what I was than years of loneliness." What does Kit have to say if his plans to hit the road with Holly are cut short by the law? "I can't deny we've had fun though. And that's more'n I can say for some." Yeah, get your kicks on Route 66, huh, kid?
The 1950s
real-life crimes that inspired the movie, those of Charles Starkweather and Caril Ann Fugate, seem to epitomize the shadow of juvenile delinquency that was blamed on rock'n'roll, comic books, and rebel movies of the era. "You know who that sumbitch looks like? You know, don't you?" says one cop to another after Kit's capture (surely that can't be a spoiler!). "I'll kiss your ass if he don't look like James Dean." Cut to Sheen, smiling, satisfied, vindicated.
I think Starkweather was a harbinger of social misfits who would look to pop culture to fill in for their missing personalities; in that way he prefigured the modern era, whether one was a sociopath or not.
Starkweather himself may have never struck the above pose but it's still an insightful piece of myth-making that doubles on itself: a movie about a man who modeled himself after the movies. Martin Sheen as Charles Starkweather aping James Dean as Jett Rink in
Giant (1956). And, again, we all know what happened to James Dean. And Charlie Starkweather. The myth, and the reality, is a foregone conclusion. That's why we love it.
So death features blandly in the lovers' everyday lives long before they flee. Kit bets his garbageman coworker a dollar that he won't eat a dead dog someone has thrown out with their trash; Holly tosses her pet catfish, gasping and twitching, into the backyard watermelon patch without a backward glance because she thinks it's sick. After getting a job in a dairy farm, Kit regards a dead cow with disaffected curiosity. Holly's father kills her dog as punishment for disobeying him when she sees Kit again.
The first human death is the obvious one: Holly's father. Gutshot while standing in the living room of his modest country home seems a particular humiliation; Holly runs to him, touches his face as he blinks tenderly, and she asks, "Daddy, are you gonna be okay?" Holly is still a child. And like children, they go and live in a treehouse like Robinson Crusoe or perhaps the Lost Boys of
Peter Pan, far from the gaze of parents, police and other authority figures. He wants his alias to be James and hers, Priscilla (natch). They dance coolly to "
Love is Strange" and rig deadly booby traps. Woe to all those that come up on them. The most trigger-happy person Holly ever knew, Kit rarely hesitates in pulling the trigger. He shoots lawmen in the back, hapless teenagers without even aiming, and even his old co-worker, who seems to take it in stride.
Near the climax - suffused as it is - the police bear down on Kit as he speeds across countless dirt roads, and he glances at himself in the rearview mirror and fixes his hair. When he (intentionally) gives up he builds a pile of rocks just before they arrive and says as he surrenders, "That there is where you caught me." He's aware of his image just like any good 20th century kid. It's all he really
is aware of. He's self-conscious without a real self. "Kit knew the end was coming. He wondered if he'd hear the doctor pronounce him dead. Or if he'd be able to read what the papers said about him the next day from the other side. He dreaded the idea of being shot down alone he said, without a girl screaming out his name."
Holly may never scream out Kit's name - she never shows that much wherewithal - but it's her oblivious schoolgirl narration that elevates this film to something so profound. Flat and without insight she relates the events of their story and never seems to apprehend the enormity of their plight. "Kit was the most trigger-happy person I ever met," she states after another murder. "He claimed as long as you were playing for keeps and the law's comin' atcha, it was okay to shoot all witnesses... He never seemed like a violent before." Voiceover at odds with the action on-screen would become a staple for Malick; Spacek's voice adds a dreamlike and hypnotic quality, as if we can be lulled into thinking we're not seeing what we truly are seeing. Any wit or humor seem inadvertent. I really can't do justice to Sheen and Spacek's delivery throughout; I can't tell if their speech is sincere or a put-on. Damn kids.
Malick began his career with the wide panoramic shots that would become his trademark, dramatic, intimate, nearly metaphysical images that summed up characters' states of mind as well as their relationship to the landscape. The cinematography, a shared duty between
Tak Fujimoto (who went on to be director of photography on major John Hughes and Jonathan Demme films), Stevan Larner, and Brian Probyn is nothing short of glorious. Asides of birds, threatening clouds, old farms and lush sunsets lend a quaint postcard quality to the proceedings, a little something sent back home from a one-way trip to Hell. Music, too, is essential to the tale; Malick depicts a world of terrible, otherworldly yet mundane beauty set to the eerie, childlike music of
Carl Orff; the score by George Tipton prefigures the indie films of the '80s and '90s in its quirky innocence.
Badlands is truly an American film, obsessed with the daily minutiae of the lives of its characters within the unforgiving landscape of the title as they race to escape the meanness in this world.
Vague plans of reaching Montana are lightly discussed. Kit spins a bottle to figure out which direction to drive. "We'll keep on heading towards that mountain. Just remember I said it wasn't such a hot idea," he says. Once their destination is named, their fate is sealed. The end is very near. And if we never get a distinct read on what drives them, perhaps Malick intended as such. Imagery and mood predominate, not psychological profiling. Despite their protestations of love, loyalty, and romance, Holly and Kit are as empty as the desert they race through, and probably as eternal.
Sheen with Malick in his uncredited bit part
10 Rillington Place (1971, dir. Richard Fleischer) A somber, grim retelling of one of England's most notorious serial killers, played with great and creepy skill by David Attenborough. Disarmingly quiet and deferential, John Christie poses as a former military doctor who now lives with his wife in a terribly run down flat in the terribly run down section of Notting Hill, London, in 1950. The film starts off immediately with that sort of kitchen-sink realism that British cinema practically invented, as Christie murders a young woman by suffocating her. When a young couple, played by John Hurt and Judy Geeson, move into the extra room above the Christies, we know trouble will follow, trouble of the worst kind. Hurt is especially terrific as the illiterate and desperately feeble liar Timothy Evans. Real-life twists and turns make this a rather heartbreaking tale. This is a quietly unsettling and subtle film, the performances and direction are first-rate, and you'll even learn an important fact about British law. It's a little-seen film that is precisely the kind I love to find, one I think folks looking for a true-crime chiller will appreciate this time of year.
Vampire Circus (1972, dir. Robert Young) A well-known Hammer flick with no US DVD release, I've wanted to see Vampire Circus since I first heard of it in the 1980s. In that time this elusive title's reputation had grown in my mind until I knew my expectation could not be fulfilled. Like a lot of Hammers it starts off with a prologue before the action proper; here, a man watches in shame as his wife offers herself up to a seductive '70s vampire dude. The towns elders converge on the vampire's castle and dispatch him, while the husband is forced to whip his wife as punishment. Or something. Years later, the circus comes to town. The vampire circus. Get it? And they're looking for some payback. The usual Hammer formula - mild T&A, terribly dorky fangs, bad hair for the men - made a bit more interesting by some mild surrealist imagery and a lithe tiger-woman. If you're a Hammer completest, get on board; other folks, stick with Lee and Cushing and Ingrid Pitt.
Audrey Rose (1977, dir. Robert Wise) I have never been interested in the original novel nor this movie version, but last Friday night I wanted a creepy ghost story and thought this might fit the bill; and if not, at least I'd get some good '70s stylings. I've recently seen a handful of Marsha Mason movies, and really liked her (Only When I Laugh, The Goodbye Girl, and Cinderella Liberty, the last one the best) so Audrey Rose had that going for it too. Sad to say, this film is just one big piece of crappy horror exploitation dressed-up in adult Hollywood clothes. I found it particularly crass in that it markets itself as a spooky creepy-kid movie but in the end simply exploits a child's death for the bullshit feel-good nonsense of reincarnation; it's not a horror film at all. Despite very good performances from Mason and Anthony Hopkins, and even with director Wise, the man behind horror goodies like The Haunting and The Body Snatcher, Audrey Rose is the major failure I always assumed it to be.
.jpg)
