Why not have Dylan played by the luminous Cate Blanchett (god, Kate Hepburn and Dylan and Queen Elizabeth? Is she going for the Gary Oldman Award for the most iconic figures portrayed on film?) That shows the same type of daring and balls that Dylan showed when he decided to follow not Woody Guthrie any longer but (as far as this here blog is concerned) the mighty Arthur Rimbaud, or plugged in at Newport, or tossed out an entire album’s worth of songs and recorded them again (which he did for Blood on the Tracks).
Plus, take one look at Blanchett in character; does she not carry the hipster haughtiness that Dylan exemplified in ’65-’66? The poise, the delicacy, but yet still with the ability to deflect any and all who strove to pigeonhole or predict him? Who's playing Bobby Neuwirth? Sarah Silverman!? No. Not really. But David Cross is playing Allen Ginsberg! Holy holy holy holy shit. Cannot wait to see if they re-enact the evisceration of that poor snaggle-toothed English journalist from Don't Look Back.
I think it's gonna work, and work bad-ass. You just watch. I don't know how it's gonna play in Topeka, Kansas, as the industry wonks are wont to expound, but who is more middle America than Dylan? Wait. Don't answer that. I know he's no Toby Keith, but come on--who'd play Toby Keith? Rosie O'Donnell?
Don't forget to cast your gaze upon the trailer. Is "Like a Rolling Stone" still the most majestic song ever? Well, duh.
3 comments:
Looks fantastic. Between this and the new Bruce album, my autumnal cultural cup runneth over!
Looks pretty great, really. I wish I could see it at the Studio.
And it's "bated breath," not "baited breath."
Gads, the Studio! That was the perfect place to see Clerks, and Dazed and Confused. Ah, heck, any halfway decent indie film from the era. Much missed.
Thanks for the correction.
Post a Comment